<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Discover the Secret World Of Online Security! &#187; osi flaws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlineworldsecurity.com/tag/osi-flaws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlineworldsecurity.com</link>
	<description>Get the Latest and Hottest News and Releases about Online Security, Internet and Computer Security at Online World Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:44:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>OSI, TCP/IP and the inherent flaws of both models</title>
		<link>http://onlineworldsecurity.com/15/osi-tcpip-and-the-inherent-flaws-of-both-models/</link>
		<comments>http://onlineworldsecurity.com/15/osi-tcpip-and-the-inherent-flaws-of-both-models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 04:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Online World Security</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet security protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osi flaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tcp/ip vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineworldsecurity.com/2007/08/19/osi-tcpip-and-the-inherent-flaws-of-both-models/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IP version 4 is completely insecure, so big hopes were cherished for the introduction of IP version 6. At least it will allow to positively identify the source of attack.
Plus, ping sweeps won’t work anymore simply because of the size of subnets that would have to be scanned. And broadcast will be changed to multicast, thus reducing the number of hosts that will be able to intercept communication. Plus it would be more difficult for worms to spread.  Of course the mandatory inclusion of IPSec in the IPv6 could theoretically be helpful too]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onlineworldsecurity.com/15/osi-tcpip-and-the-inherent-flaws-of-both-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
