<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Discover the Secret World Of Online Security! &#187; black hat seo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlineworldsecurity.com/tag/black-hat-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlineworldsecurity.com</link>
	<description>Get the Latest and Hottest News and Releases about Online Security, Internet and Computer Security at Online World Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:44:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Black Hat SEO + Hackers = The End of Google Relevance?</title>
		<link>http://onlineworldsecurity.com/44/black-hat-seo-hackers-the-end-of-google-relevance/</link>
		<comments>http://onlineworldsecurity.com/44/black-hat-seo-hackers-the-end-of-google-relevance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Online World Security</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Security Paradigms and Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Business Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hat seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineworldsecurity.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEO specialists from Poland identified one of the factors which are currently heavily used by Google to define relevancy of the search results. I’m talking about the velocity. In lame terms velocity is nothing more than the “freshness” of the particular post and links. The more recent the post is, the bigger its weight. Sure, there are many other factors that are taken into consideration as well – such as the number of incoming links, domain age, etc. I’m talking about velocity here, because that’s what allowed seo pros to exploit Google algorithm and, along with artificially generated incoming links, get millions of pages ranked for the keywords of their choice.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onlineworldsecurity.com/44/black-hat-seo-hackers-the-end-of-google-relevance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
